Zu diesem Heft / About this edition
English Summaries
Autoren / Autorinnen / Authors
ARTIKEL/ARTICLES
GRZEGORZ GROMADZKI
An Urgent Challenge for Today's Europe: The Eastern Partnership
The Eastern Partnership (EaP), a Polish–Swedish initiative, was officially
launched in May 2009. It is the EU’s newest program for building relations
with six countries from Eastern Europe and the Southern Caucasus:
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. The EaP
is facing fundamental challenges. What is needed is success with regard to
at least one EaP country that would serve as a good example for the others.
ROSA BALFOUR
Debating the Eastern Partnership: Perspectives from the European Union
Taking a 20-year historical perspective, the EU has gradually increased
its level of engage-ment in Eastern Europe and the Southern Caucasus.
However, the EaP falls short in addressing the key political and security
dilemmas by using soft policy and external governance tools. This can
allow the EaP countries to take an »à la carte« approach to enga-gement
with the EU. The recently established democracies remain fragile, political
reform is stalled in most cases, and opening avenues for greater contacts
with the EU so far has not produced sufficient results with the more
authoritarian regimes.
ANDREI ZAGORSKI
Eastern Partnership from the Russian Perspective
The EaP has raised a number of critical questions in Moscow. Its objectives,
if successfully attained, are expected to cause significant disadvantages
for Russia, pre-eminent among which are the difficulties it is likely
to cause for integration between the Russian Federation and the EaP
countries. This is because the EaP is perceived as a hindrance to the closer
cooperation of those countries with the Russian Federation: indeed, some
in Moscow see the EaP as deliberately designed to undermine such cooperation.
BORIS NAVASARDIAN
Armenia: Imagining the Integration of the Southern Caucasus with the EU
The 2009 launch of the EaP not only contributed to the overall strengthening
of EU–Armenian relations but also envisaged correction of the
shortcomings of the ENP. Parliamentary and civil society forums were
included with a view to raising public awareness of the details of the program,
as a result of which it may be hoped that there will be more regard
for the public interest. Nonetheless, there is still uncertainty about the
priorities of the EaP, as well as controversy around the perceptions of the
initiative, in both the partner countries and the EU itself.
RASHAD SHIRINOV
A Pragmatic Area for Cooperation: Azerbaijan and the EU
Relations between Azerbaijan and Euro-Atlantic structures have deteriorated
once more and the Azerbaijani ruling elite have seemingly spurned
European values. This seems partly connected to the relative decline of
European and us power vis-à-vis Russia in the former Soviet sphere.
However, this decline is observed mostly in the realm of human rights
and democratization, whereas in the areas of economic development,
social policy, the environ-ment, and other »soft« issues the Azerbaijani
government is largely open to cooperation.
VLADIMIR ULAKHOVICH
Belarus and the Eastern Partnership: Still a Long Way to Go
Perceptions of the EaP remain quite different in Belarus and in Europe,
and this creates barriers to cooperation. The EU should extend the EaP,
as it has shown its value as an innovative forum for deepening relations.
In particular, the EaP should focus on reinforcing the role of civil society
actors and support the broadest possible channels for discussion. EU
policy towards Eastern Europe should advocate a change in Europe’s
energy supply paradigm.
TAMAR KHIDASHELI
Georgia's European Way
The five-day war of August 2008 altered Georgian reality. In the postconflict
era, the Georgian authorities have perceived the EU as the only
alternative for ensuring the security and territorial integrity of the country.
There is a general consensus that Georgia has to strengthen its democracy.
In 2008, President Saakashvili promised a »new wave of democracy«;
however, the reality has been disappointing. Indeed, according to assessments by Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House, Georgia’s
media is less free and pluralistic today than it was before the Rose Revolution.
VICTOR CHIRILA
New Opportunities for Moldova
Since the elections of 2009, Moldova has been governed by a coalition
that supports Moldova’s gradual integration with the EU. As a result, the
EU has started negotiations on the future Association Agreement which
will offer political association and economic integration. Nevertheless, the
EaP has not overcome the main structural deficiency of the ENP, which is
its weak motivation and conditionality package. This structural deficiency
is somewhat concealed, inasmuch as Moldova is determined to implement
all necessary reforms without waiting to be given a clear-cut prospect of
European integration.
IRYNA SOLONENKO
Added Value? Eastern Partnership and EU-Ukraine Bilateral Relations
The offer expressed in the European Commission’s Communication on
the EaP contains interesting ideas, including regional development programs
similar to the EU’s convergence policy, direct cooperation between
regions of the EU and partner countries, cross-border cooperation among
the EaP partner countries and, in the longer term, the possibility of a
targeted opening of the EU labor market and the prospect of full access to
the single market.
ALEXANDRA DOBRA
Microfinance: Champion in Poverty Alleviation and Failure in Female Empowerment
In the past few years the provision of financial services to low-income
clients via microfinance programs has dramatically increased due to its
positive effects on development. Microfinance programs provide an effective
and operational policy tool which has been successful in reducing
poverty »holistically,« in the sense that women tend to share their income
with others more than men. However, the rigidity of microfinance programs
does little to enhance female political empowerment.
REZENSIONEN/BOOK REVIEWS
Alle Rezensionen als PDF / All reviews as PDF
HELMUT STRIZEK:
Clinton am Kivu-See. Die Geschichte einer afrikanischen Katastrophe
(Rezensent:
Franz Ansprenger)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOHN J. MEARSHEIMER:
Why Leaders Lie. The Truth about Lying in International Politics
(Rezensentin:
Anja Wehler-Schöck)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROBERT SKIDELSKY:
Die Rückkehr des Meisters. Keynes für das 21. Jahrhundert
(Rezensent:
Nebi Kesen)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THOMAS GEOGHEGAN:
Were You Born on the Wrong Continent? How the European Model Can Help You Get a Life
(Rezensent:
Thomas Greven)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TIM JACKSON:
Prosperity without Growth
(Rezensent:
Helmut Zell)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEINRICH BERGSTRESSER:
Nigeria: Macht und Ohnmacht am Golf von Guinea
JOHN CAMPBELL:
Nigeria: Dancing on the Brink
(Rezensent: Thomas Mättig)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ULRICH BRAND:
Post-Neoliberalismus? Aktuelle Konflikte. Gegen-hegemoniale Strategien.
(Rezensent: Stefan Brocza)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|