This page uses cookies
These Cookies are necessary
Data to improve the website with tracking (Matomo).
These are cookies that come from external sites and services, e.g. Youtube or Vimeo.
Enter your username and password here in order to log in on the website
Trends and patterns of violations of the right to strike in countries around the world with particular emphasis on the years 2012-2016.
Image: Striking dressmakers, ca. 1955 of Kheel Center licensed under CC BY 2.0
The study highlights how one pillar of Decent Work is under attack. Rights at Work encompasses the right to collective bargaining which in turn protects the right to strike.
As this FES study shows, 117 of 119 countries surveyed violate the right to strike. Of those, 89 countries have introduced new violations in the last 5 years. This attack which simultaneously takes place at the national and international level, weakens further workers’ and their unions’ strength to tackle rising inequality and other economic and social problems.
It confirms a global trend of state authoritarianism and the ‘securitizing’ of politics and society that put fundamental democratic rights of freedom of speech and assembly at stake in many countries.
Xhafa, Edlira
an analysis of recent trends / Edlira Xhafa. - Berlin : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Global Policy and Development, October 2016. - 20 Seiten = 370 KB, PDF-File. - (Study / Friedrich Ebert Stiftung)Electronic ed.: Berlin : FES, 2016ISBN 978-3-95861-608-0
Download (PDF) (370 KB, PDF-File)
Konstantin Bärwaldt
+49 30 269 35-7501
Konstantin.Baerwaldt(at)fes.de
All FES experts on the International Community and Civil Society
For millions of people the Corona virus is both a threat to their health and their job. Now is the moment to push governments towards establishing basic social protection. As an instrument to exert pressure, FES offers a map that identifies gaps in social protection worldwide. more
How close is the global community to reaching the Sustainability Goals? The annual Spotlight Report focuses on obstacles and contradictions regarding the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. more