This page uses cookies
These Cookies are necessary
Data to improve the website with tracking (Matomo).
These are cookies that come from external sites and services, e.g. Youtube or Vimeo.
Enter your username and password here in order to log in on the website
FES Reflection Group launches final report on monopoly on the use of force in the 21st Century.
Image: Publication Cover of FES
In 2014, the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) set up the Global Reflection Group “Monopoly on the use of force 2.0?” as an initiative to raise awareness of what the current international security order is – theoretically – based on: national monopolies on the use of force.
The group analysed the current state of these monopolies and discussed progressive policy options that safeguard both human security and a just international order.
The group's final report "Providing Security in Times of Uncertainty" suggests a "two-pronged approach": strengthen the state monopoly on the legitimate use of force or, where appropriate, initiate a process to meld the growing number of fragmented security providers into a regulated and coordinated security architecture that protects citizens in an inclusive and accountable way.
More information on and papers by the Reflection Group:http://www.fes.de/de/reflection-group-monopoly-on-the-use-of-force-20
Opting for a mosaic security system / report of the Global Reflection Group "Monopoly on the Use of Force 2.0?". - Berlin : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Global Policy and Development, June 2017. - 44 Seiten = 500 KB, PDF-File. - Electronic ed.: Berlin : FES, 2017ISBN 978-3-95861-848-0
Download publication (500 KB, PDF-File)
Keine Ansprechpartner vorhanden.
Will the US election have an impact on the Global South at all? Find out more about the conference and register for the Tiergarten Talk on our website. more
Joint project with the GIGA on concepts of peace. More on our website more
3 questions, 3 answers, 3 minutes: Asian and European thought leaders unpack what the EU’s upcoming Indo-Pacific strategy means for the region. more
more
Mapping national debates on the future of the atlantic alliance more