On the 6th of September 2017 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rejected a claim brought by Hungary and Slovakia against the EU's mandatory refugee relocation scheme. In an analysis for the FES, hungarian political scientist Tamás Boros explains why Hungary vehemently refuses to accept refugees and how the government intends to take action against the ECJ decision. He points out that the Hungarian government had already been conducting a communications campaign warning citizens of the “pernicious” effect of immigration months before hundreds of thousands of migrants arrived in Hungary in autumn 2015. The anti-migration strategy was extremely successful. "Every minute when the Prime Minister is in the media talking about migrants serves to sustain his power", so Boros.
The analysis is part of a newly launched series in which we report on current debates on migration in European countries.
Kontakt: Timo Rinke, Head of Regional Project “Flight, migration, integration in Europe”, FES-Office in Budapest.
Boros, Tamás
Download publication (150 KB, PDF-File)
According to the author of this study, Bodo Weber, countries along migration routes continue to block incoming migrants, sometimes violently, but the…
Read more
Today, most migrants to Europe arrive in Italy. Because the EU has failed to provide enough help in accommodating them, the country increasingly has…
Read more
Edited volume on European policy and its relationship with migration and flight now available in English and Spanish.
Read more
Migration can be shaped justly and globally. 10 messages to change our perspectives on migration and mobility.
Read more