Reflection Group “Monopoly on the use of force 2.0?”

Is there a need for new peace and security rules in the 21st century?

Ann L. Phillips

The final report, distills the findings of a two-year effort by more than 20 international experts to find answers on how to overcome rising insecurity and its attendant ills.

Bild: Think piece21

SUMMARY

Authoritarian states remind us how repressive state monopoly on the use of force can be. Nonetheless, as imperfect as they are, the state still has the best potential to provide inclusive security as a public good. Whether in the United States or in fragile and conflict affected states, hybrid or mosaic security arrangements do not provide a durable and sustainable solution to insecurity.

Phillips, Ann L.

Providing security in times of uncertainty

Implications of the Reflection Group's final report for the United States and recommendations for U.S. foreign assistance
Berlin, 2018

weitere Informationen

Publikation herunterladen (680 KB, PDF-File)

zurück

Latest Issues

09.03.2018 Mely Caballero-Anthony, Frieden und Sicherheit | Publikation
Think Piece 22: Security in Times of Uncertainty in Asia
Asias security outlook still appears to be laden with uncertainties. From the changing dynamics in the balance of power, an emboldened North Korea and…
weitere Informationen
08.03.2018 Ann L. Phillips, Frieden und Sicherheit | Publikation
Think Piece 21: Providing Security in Times of Uncertainty
The final report, distills the findings of a two-year effort by more than 20 international experts to find answers on how to overcome rising…
weitere Informationen
20.07.2017 Jaïr van der Lijn, Publikation
Think Piece 20: The future of the monopoly on the legitimate use of force - Four alternative global futures
The paper presents four alternative global futures for the monopoly on the legitimate use of force that aim to allow policy makers to embrace…
weitere Informationen