Reflection Group “Monopoly on the use of force 2.0?”

Is there a need for new peace and security rules in the 21st century?

Carolina G. Hernandez

State actors are to some extend responsible for the rise of ethnic separatism and religious extremism in Southeast Asia, with negative consequences for human security.

Think Piece 19: Ethnic separatism and religious extremism in Southeast Asia

Bild: Cover "Think Piece No. 19" von FES

SUMMARY

Separatism and extremism in Southeast Asia have unfortunately been associated with Islam as seen in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand and have contributed to the hybridization of security provision in these countries.
State actors, such as the military, the police, the defense bureaucracy, and politicians are perceived to have been accountable for the rise of these twin phenomena in Southeast Asia, and could be major causes of the hybridization of security provision in the subregion.
Regional cooperation to stem the impact of external forces like daesh/ISIS/ISIL have been stepping up in recent years, as seen in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).

Hernandez, Carolina G.

Ethnic separatism and religious extremism in Southeast Asia

Implications for the monopoly on the use of force
Berlin, 2017

weitere Informationen

Publikation herunterladen (200 KB, PDF-File)

zurück

Latest Issues

09.03.2018 Mely Caballero-Anthony, Frieden und Sicherheit | Publikation
Think Piece 22: Security in Times of Uncertainty in Asia
Asias security outlook still appears to be laden with uncertainties. From the changing dynamics in the balance of power, an emboldened North Korea and…
weitere Informationen
08.03.2018 Ann L. Phillips, Frieden und Sicherheit | Publikation
Think Piece 21: Providing Security in Times of Uncertainty
The final report, distills the findings of a two-year effort by more than 20 international experts to find answers on how to overcome rising…
weitere Informationen
20.07.2017 Jaïr van der Lijn, Publikation
Think Piece 20: The future of the monopoly on the legitimate use of force - Four alternative global futures
The paper presents four alternative global futures for the monopoly on the legitimate use of force that aim to allow policy makers to embrace…
weitere Informationen